Open Access Journal

ISSN : 2456-1290 (Online)

International Journal of Engineering Research in Computer Science and Engineering (IJERCSE)

Monthly Journal for Computer Science and Engineering

Open Access Journal

International Journal of Engineering Research in Mechanical and Civil Engineering (IJERMCE)

Monthly Journal for Mechanical and Civil Engineering

ISSN : 2456-1290 (Online)

Call For Paper : Vol 11, Issue 05, May 2024
Under Slung Steel Truss Bridge with Composite RCC Deck

Author : A.Sharma 1 P.K.Singh 2 K.K.Pathak 3

Date of Publication :9th November 2017

Abstract: The most common cause of structural failure in steel bridges is buckling of a compression member. Buckling failure is a sudden failure and offers no warning before collapse. Recently, in the year 2012, a 190m span steel truss bridge over river Alaknanda, in Uttrakhand, India, suddenly collapsed during casting of the deck slab due to buckling of one of its top cord compression members. Its failure during construction stage raised doubts on current design practices where, the factor of safety provided by the codes do not guarantee performance of the bridge in overload conditions. In the case of composite under slung bridges, premature buckling of top cord compression member is prevented by the RCC deck connected with the steel truss with the help of shear studs. Further, this allows the steel truss members to take stress up to their ultimate strength. A 30 m span bridge is analysed with composite action of RCC deck for service and overload conditions. The maximum flexural strain due to live load alone in the RCC deck slab is found to be 0.00026. Shrinkage strain for M30 concrete deck slab is taken as 0.0003. Hence, even during service condition, composite action between the steel girder and RCC deck slab may not take place. For the analysed deck type bridge, total load on the bridge in terms of uniformly distributed load in service conditions for (DL+LL) case is 153.7kN/m, and in overload condition for 1.5x(DL+LL) case it is 230.55kN/m. At plastic stage the bridge can carry an equivalent udl of 635.98kN/m. Thus, for the plastic collapse, apart from warning due to excessive deflection, there is a factor of safety of 4.1 in comparison to service load. For prestressed concrete bridges, load combination at ultimate strength for severe condition, as per Cl. 12 of IRC: 18-2000, is prescribed as 1.5G+2SG+2.5Q. Whereas, in case of steel truss bridges, as per IRC: 24-2010 and IRC: 6-2010, load combinations and permissible stresses are given in Table 1, Cl. 202.3 for service condition only. IRC codes haven’t provided any specific provision for ultimate strength of steel truss bridges. Therefore, a parallel clause for ultimate strength of steel truss bridges also may be added, for which composite under slung bridges may be found to be suitable.

Reference :

    1. A. Reis, J.O. Pedro, Composite truss bridges: New trends, design and research, Steel Construction 4, No. 3, 2011.
    2. A. Reis, J.O. Pedro, Composite truss bridges: New trends, Design and Research, Eurosteel Conference Aug-31st –Sep 2nd , Budapest Hungry, 2011.
    3.  H. S. Birajdar, P. R. Maiti, P. K. Singh. "Failure of Chauras bridge." Engineering Failure Analysis, Elsevier, Vol. 45, 2014, pp. 339-346.
    4.  H. S. Birajdar, P. R. Maiti, P. K. Singh. "Strengthening of Garudchatti bridge after failure of Charus Bridge" Engineering Failure Analysis, Elsevier, Vol. 62, pp. 339-346, 2015.
    5.  B. M. Imam, M. K. Chryssanthopoulos, “A review of metallic bridge failure statistics,” Proc. 5th International conference on bridge maintenance, safety and management, Philadelphia, USA, IABMAS, pp. 635-636, 2010.
    6. A. J. Reis, “Bridge decks: composite systems for improved aesthetics and environmental impact.” Proc. 3rd Int. Meeting on Composite Bridges, Madrid, pp. 645, 2001.
    7. J. Machacek, M. Charvat. "Design of Shear Connection between Steel Truss and Concrete Slab", 11th International Conference on Modern Building Materials, Structures and Techniques, MBMST 2013, Procedia Engineering, Elsevier, 57, pp. 722-729, 2013.
    8. IS: 1343-1980, Code of Practice for Prestressed Concrete, India, 1999. [9] User Manual, STAAD.Pro V8i, Bently software, 2017.
    9. M. H. Azmi, 'Composite Open-Web Trusses with metal Cellular Floor', Master of Engineering thesis, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, 1972.
    10.  IRC: 24-2010, Standard specifications and code of practice for road bridges, Section V, Steel road bridges, India, 2010.
    11. Canadian Institute of Steel Construction (CISC), Handbook of Steel Construction, CAN/CSA S16.1 94, Section 16, “Open-Web Steel Joists”, 7th Edition, Willowdale, Ontario, 2003.

Recent Article