International Journal of Engineering Research in Electronics and Communication Engineering

Microplastic Pollution in the Shore Sediments of Narmada River Along Jabalpur City

Author : Devendra Singh Tomar ¹ D. C. Rahi ²

Date of Publication :14th May 2022

Abstract: Microplastics, due to their microscopic size, constitute a concern to aquatic species since they are easier to consume and the recent discovery of microplastic in human blood shows that these may also have undisclosed health effects on humans. This study provides microplastic characteristics and abundance of microplastics in the shore sediments of Narmada river flowing along Jabalpur City. The information about the presence of microplastics can be crucial in preventing further pollution and developing management interventions. Sediments samples were collected from 4 sites along a 50 km stretch of the river. Sample pretreatment was performed using ZnCl2 solution for density separation and H2O2 for oxidation of organic material. Microplastics examination was carried out using Fourier Transform Infrared Spectroscopy (FTIR). Microplastics in the 20-1000 Î¼m size range were found to be more abundant (114-273 MP/Kg) than larger microplastics in the 1-5 mm size range (18-110 MP/Kg). This research presents the first accounts of microplastic pollution in the shore sediments of Narmada River and it emphasizes the need for more in-depth research into microplastic pollution in fresh water sources

Reference :

1. Plasctic Europe - Association of Plastics Manufactures, “Plastics – the Facts 2020,” Plast. Eur., pp. 1–64, 2020,
2. L. Lebreton and A. Andrady, “Future scenarios of global plastic waste generation and disposal,” Palgrave Commun., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–11, 2019, doi: 10.1057/s41599-018-0212-7.
3. M. Wagner and S. Lambert, “Freshwater Microplastics - The Handbook of Environmental Chemistry 58,” p. 302, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-61615-5.
4. I. Efimova, M. Bagaeva, A. Bagaev, A. Kileso, and I. P. Chubarenko, “Secondary microplastics generation in the sea swash zone with coarse bottom sediments: Laboratory experiments,” Front. Mar. Sci., vol. 5, no. SEP, 2018, doi: 10.3389/fmars.2018.00313.
5. M. C. M. Blettler, E. Abrial, F. R. Khan, N. Sivri, and L. A. Espinola, “Freshwater plastic pollution: Recognizing research biases and identifying knowledge gaps,” Water Res., vol. 143, pp. 416–424, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2018.06.015.
6. K. Amrutha and A. K. Warrier, “The first report on the source-to-sink characterization of microplastic pollution from a riverine environment in tropical India,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 739, p. 140377, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2020.140377.
7. S. E. Nelms et al., “Riverine plastic pollution from fisheries: Insights from the Ganges River system,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 756, p. 143305, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv .2020.143305.
8. M. A. Browne et al., “Accumulation of Microplastic on Shorelines Woldwide: Sources and Sinks - Environmental Science & Technology (ACS Publications),” Environ. Sci. Technol, pp. 9175–9179, 2011, [Online].
9. T. A. Aragaw, “Surgical face masks as a potential source for microplastic pollution in the COVID-19 scenario,” Mar. Pollut. Bull., vol. 159, p. 111517, 2020, doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul. 2020.111517.
10. X. Xiong, C. Wu, J. J. Elser, Z. Mei, and Y. Hao, “Occurrence and fate of microplastic debris in middle and lower reaches of the Yangtze River – From inland to the sea,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 659, pp. 66–73, 2019, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv. 2018.12.313.
11. M. N. Issac and B. Kandasubramanian, “Effect of microplastics in water and aquatic systems,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 28, no. 16, pp. 19544–19562, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13184-2.
12. H. C. Vo and M. H. Pham, “Ecotoxicological effects of microplastics on aquatic organisms: a review,” Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res., vol. 28, no. 33, pp. 44716–44725, 2021, doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-14982-4.
13. M. Smith, D. C. Love, C. M. Rochman, and R. A. Neff, “Microplastics in Seafood and the Implications for Human Health,” Curr. Environ. Heal. reports, vol. 5, no. 3, pp. 375– 386, 2018, doi: 10.1007/s40572-018-0206-z.
14. L. G. A. Barboza, A. Dick Vethaak, B. R. B. O. Lavorante, A. K. Lundebye, and L. Guilhermino, “Marine microplastic debris: An emerging issue for food security, food safety and human health,” Mar. Pollut. Bull., vol. 133, no. May, pp. 336– 348, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.05.047.
15. H. A. Leslie, M. J. M. van Velzen, S. H. Brandsma, D. Vethaak, J. J. Garcia-Vallejo, and M. H. Lamoree, “Discovery and quantification of plastic particle pollution in human blood,” Environ. Int., no. March, p. 107199, 2022, doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2022.107199.
16. I. E. Napper et al., “The abundance and characteristics of microplastics in surface water in the transboundary Ganges River *,” Environ. Pollut., no. xxxx, p. 116348, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.envpol.2020.116348.
17. T. Tsering, M. Sillanpää, M. Sillanpää, M. Viitala, and S. Reinikainen, “Science of the Total Environment Microplastics pollution in the Brahmaputra River and the Indus River of the Indian Himalaya,” vol. 789, 2021, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147968.
18. L. Li et al., “A straightforward method for measuring the range of apparent density of microplastics,” Sci. Total Environ., vol. 639, pp. 367–373, 2018, doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.05.166.
19. V. Hidalgo-Ruz, L. Gutow, R. C. Thompson, and M. Thiel, “Microplastics in the marine environment: A review of the methods used for identification and quantification,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 46, no. 6, pp. 3060–3075, 2012, doi: 10.1021/es2031505.